DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
ROARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
704 ©, COURTHOUSE RD SUITE 1001
ARLINGTON VA 22204-2490
BAN
Docket No.NR04193-14
15 July 2014
; ‘ = 1 = Saami me ey ee Sn an
from: Chairwman, Budd ror LoLrrecrivi sf Naval Records
To: Secretary of |:he Navy
a EE TE a
Ref: (a) Title 10 #f.S.C. 1552
Encl: (1) DD Form 149 w/attachments
(2) Navy Personnel Command (NPC) memo 1430 Ser 812/0222 of
14 Jul 2014
1. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed
enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the
applicable naval record be corrected to show that his Time in Rate to
E-5/MM2 be restored to March 2011 and that he was authorized to take
the March 2014 E-6/JIM1 advancement examination.
2. The Board, cons .sting of Ms. Davis, Ms. Wilcher and Mr. Grover
reviewed Petitioner|s allegations of error and injustice on
15 July 2014 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the
corrective action iidicated below ghould be taken on the available
evidence of record.) Documentary material considered by the Board
consisted of the enclosures, naval records, and applicable statutes,
regulations and pollicies.
3. The Board, havilag reviewed. all the facts of record pertaining to
Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice, finds as follows:
a. Before applying to this Board, Petitioner exhausted all
administrative remedies available under existing law and regulations
within the Department of the Navy.
b. In correspondence attached as enclosure (2), the office
having cognizance ¢ver the subject matter addressed in Petitioner's
application has commented to the effect that the request has merit and
warrants favorable| action.
CONCLUSION
Upon review and colusideration of all the evidence of record, and
especially in lighi- of the contents of enclosure (2), the Board finds
the existence of aji injustice warranting the following corrective
action.
bocket WNo.NRV4i93-14
RECOMMENDATION:
That Petitioner's naval record be corrected, where appropriate, as
follows:
E-5/MM2 from the September 2010
fFfective date of 16 March 2011
a Sat
eo
a. Petitioner was advanced to
Navy-wide advancement exam with an e
with a Time 1n Kate Gate ol 1 Jatuary
E-6/MM1 from the September 2013
b. Petitioner was advanced to
ffective date of 16 June 2014 with
Navy-wide advancement exam with ane
a Time in Rate date of 1 January 2014.
c. Petitioner is authorized to receive any back-pay and
allowances for the back-dated advancements.
dg. That a copy of this Report of Proceedings be filed in
Petitioner’s naval record.
(c) of the revised Procedures of the Board
ds (32 Code of Federal Regulations,
fied that quorum was present at the
Board's review and deliberations, and that the foregoing is a true and
complete record of the Board’s proceedings in the above entitled
matter.
wf
ROBERT D. ZSALMAN DA CASH
Recorder A g \Recorder
4. Pursuant to Section 6
for Correction of Naval Recor
Section 723.6(c)) it ig certi
Sh Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section 6(e)
of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of Naval Records
(32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section 723.6(e)) and having assured
compliance with its provisions, it is hereby announced that the
foregoing corrective action, taken under the authority of reference
(a), has been approved by the Board on behalf of the Secretary of the
Navy.
15 July 2014 TR fit
ROBERT D. ZSALMAN
Acting Executive Director
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2889 14
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that he was advanced to ET1/E6 from the March 2011 Navy-wide advancement exam. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Zsalman, Ruskin and George reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 4 August 2014 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on.the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR4169-13
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that Petitioner was advanced to E-5/MM2 from the March 2012 Navy-wide advancement examination. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, Zsalman and George reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 20 August 2013 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3533 14
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S. COURTHOUSE RD SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON VA 22204-2490 BAN Docket No.NRO3533-14 8 May 2014 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: A a Ref: (a} Title 10 U.S.C. The Board determined the following factors militated in favor of relief: That Petitioner did pass the PFA before the limiting date, as required, that the CO endorsed Petitioner's selection for advancement by “frocking” him...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR8585 13
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 §. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that Petitioner was advanced to E-5/MM2 from the September 2012 Navy-wide advancement exam. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Zsalman, Ruskin and George reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 10 March 2014 and, pursuant to its...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3893 14
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to 5 advanced to B-5/MM2 from the March 2013 Navy-wide advancement | evele. Navy Personnel Command is directed to issue Petitioner a DD Form 215 to correct his effective date of rank and pay. 7, Bi Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section 6(e) of the revised Procedures of the Board for correction of Naval Records...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR8335-13
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that Petitioner was advanced to E-6/BM1 from the August 2011 Navy-wide Reserve advancement exam. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Zsalman, Ruskin and George reviewed_Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2970 14
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that her Performance Mark Average (PMA) for the September 2011 Navy-wide advancement exam cycle 212 should have been 3.8 vice 3.7. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Zsalman, Ruskin and Exnicios reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 21 July 2014 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR9380 13
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that he was advanced to IT2/E5 from the September 2012 Navy-wide advancement exam. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Zsalman, Ruskin and George reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 4 August 2014 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 00938-09
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that Petitioner was advanced to E5/MM2 from the March 2008, Navy-wide advancement exam. The Board, consisting of Messrs. George, ‘Zsalman, and Exnicios reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 2 November 2009 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3535 14
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that Petitioner was advanced to E-6/AWF1 from the March 2013 Navy-wide advancement examination due to two missing award points. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Zsalman, Exnicios and George reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 7 April 2014 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective...